Here
is a description of what people want in a leader. See how do you compare?
If
you were to build a house, you would begin with a blueprint. This blueprint
proves useful because it contains more than directions on how to build a house.
It also describes the finished house.
So,
what does this have to do with leadership?
Curious
about it, I asked an audience of
leaders to tell me the characteristics of an ideal leader. I then, later asked
the same questions to a random group of employees and compiled the answers and
here is what I got (surprisingly similar in order between both groups):
A
good listener
Enthusiastic/
Passionate / Charismatic
Shows
appreciation
Visionary
Role
model/ Leads by example
Trusting/
Credible/ High Integrity
Organized
Knowledgeable
Persuasive
Team
building/ Empower others/ Understands followers
Clarity
of purpose
Problem
solver
Attitude
of service
Patience
Consistent
Adapts
to change.
From
this poll I was able to gain some useful insights.
Notice
what the list contains. Most of these characteristics relate to the human side
of leadership. That's interesting because I often hear people minimize this
side of leadership with terms like "soft" or "touchy
feely." Actually, applying these characteristics requires more strength
than not.
Now
take a look at what the list excludes. Sometimes the words not spoken are
louder than the words used. Absent from this list are characteristics such as
stern, mean, serious, short tempered, vindictive, tough, angry, harsh,
punitive, controlling, violent, or ruthless. And that's interesting because
many popular representations of leadership emphasize at least one of these
"hard" characteristics. In fact, these characteristics are the refuge
of those who lack the strength (or the skills) to apply the human side of
leadership.
How
about you? How would you rate yourself as a leader compared to the list of
positive characteristics listed above? If you were to survey the people around
you (especially those whom you lead), how would they describe your leadership?
Would they list characteristics from the "soft" list or from the
"hard" list? Could you become more effective by improving upon any of
the "soft" characteristics? And how about the other leaders in your
organization? Do they truly maximize human potential?
People
want leaders who treat them with genuine compassion, courtesy, and respect.
They want leaders who help them become more successful. They want leaders who
inspire them with a vision for a better world and show them how to get there or
create it, not one who constantly threaten them with termination.
No comments:
Post a Comment